Even if we restrict our focus to finance, and restrict finance
to the stock market, one would never know from this sunnyside-up
imagery that tickers record busts as well as booms, that Wall
Street has been regularly swept by financial panics, that
the American economy has repeatedly crumpled into recession
or depression. As there's no down side to finance capitalism,
there's no need to saddle the Man Who Made Modern America
with any responsibility for such debacles. Had the exhibit
chosen to glance at the real historical record, however, it
might have related to visitors the fascinating drama of the
first stock market crash in American history, and the Hero's
role therein.
Hamilton believed that "those who are most commonly creditors
of a nation, are, generally speaking, enlightened men."
They would, he was sure, invest their government-bestowed
capital in enhancing the country's commercial and manufacturing
base, thus allowing the US to compete with Great Britain in
the global arena. Instead they plunged into an orgy of new
speculation and market manipulation.
In February 1791, at Hamilton's urging, Congress authorized
creation of a Bank of the United States, to be capitalized
at ten million dollars, with the government putting up one
fifth, and the remainder to be raised by a sale of stock beginning
in July. B.U.S. subscription shares sold out instantly, and
were as quickly resold, with eager buyers, visions of future
profits dancing in their heads, bidding up the value of a
barely existent bank from $25 to $60 almost overnight, from
$60 to $100 in two days, from $100 to $150 in a single day.
By the end of October shares were at $170 and a number of
Hamilton's associates had acquired big stakes in the B.U.S.
as well as seats on its board.
At the center of the frenzy, once again, was William Duer,
the Darth Vader of early American finance. (Though still in
close touch with Hamilton, he was no longer at the Treasury:
"I have left to do better," he explained). At the
end of December 1791, Duer mobilized a small group of New
York speculators - among them one John Pintard, who later
would found the New-York Historical Society - to rig the market
by making massive purchases of bank stocks (and government
paper), driving up their value by various machinations, then
unloading their holdings at tremendous profit.
Borrowing (and embezzling) vast sums to finance their manipulations,
the co-conspirators inflated a speculative bubble that sucked
in many ordinary citizens. Hamilton, though personally incorruptible,
had been stoking the fever as good for business, but now he
grew alarmed. "These extravagant sallies of speculation,"
he wrote in January 1792, "do injury to the government
and to the whole system of public credit, by disgusting all
sober citizens, and giving a wild air to every thing."
Far from making sober long term investments, his "enlightened"
men seemed gripped by an irrational exuberance. Robert R.
Livingston noted that in New York City "hundreds have
made fortunes by speculating in the funds ... and have no
idea of a more perfect government than that which enriches
them in six months."
Early in March, stock prices leveled off, then declined slightly.
Coincidentally, the government notified Duer of a $250,000
discrepancy in his accounts as Assistant Treasury Secretary.
No longer able to raise cash, Duer began to sell. On March
10, as panic engulfed New York, he stopped payment on all
his debts; two weeks later he was arrested and thrown in debtor's
prison, one step ahead of a crowd seeking to disembowel him.
(One creditor got into the prison, confronted Duer with a
brace of dueling pistols, demanded he pay immediately or defend
his honor, and left only after Duer forked over what he owed.)
Pintard escaped his creditors by fleeing town.
The panic touched off a wider economic crisis. Many leading
merchants were ruined; many ordinary citizens lost their life
savings; business languished; unemployment spread. "The
credit and fate of the nation seem to hang on the desperate
throws and plunges of gambling scoundrels," wrote Jefferson,
who calculated that losses exceeded the combined value of
all Manhattan's real estate.
Hamilton hadn't counted on this. As Chernow notes, "the
financial turmoil on Wall Street and the William Duer debacle
pointed up a glaring defect in Hamilton's political theory:
the rich could put their own interests above the national
interest." Worried "about abuses committed against
the rich," Hamilton had minimized "the skulduggery
that might be committed by the rich." He acknowledged
to a worried Washington that speculation "may be attended
with pernicious effects," that it "fosters a spirit
of gambling, and diverts a certain number of individuals from
other pursuits." Still, he was not prepared to accept
Jefferson's judgment that it constituted a "canker at
the heart of the Hamilton enterprise". Loathing idle
capital, he insisted it should be possible to draw "a
line of separation between honest men and knaves" - "between
respectable stockholders and mere unprincipled gamblers"-by
relying on the power of "public infamy."
PREVIOUS
PAGE | NEXT
PAGE