Myth #6: The Grid Plan Caused Too Much Density and Rampant Land Speculation
By Jason M. Barr with Gerard Koeppel
In the two centuries since its creation, the grid plan has had no shortage of critics. Many, for example, have bemoaned its relentless monotony, its disregard for Manhattan’s topography and its lack of grand boulevards. In many respects, the grid has become a kind of Rorschach blot for the failures of 19th century New York to provide a cleaner, more efficient, and greener city. Detractors often see the plan as the cause or catalyst of the larger problems that New York confronted from rapid economic growth, massive immigration and poverty, and a municipal government that was, more or less, unable and unwilling to effectively handle these issues.
Read More
Paul Rudolph: Would-be Savior of Robert Moses's Lost Highway Dream
By Sam Lubell and Greg Goldin
Read More
Myth #5: The Grid Plan Leveled Manhattan
By Jason Barr with Gerard Koeppel
In 1609, when Henry Hudson sailed up the river that now bears his name, he saw an island forest covered in oak, pine and tulip trees. Two centuries later, in 1811, when the grid plan was enacted, most of Manhattan was still undeveloped. In fact, the footprint of the city itself encompassed only 1.3 square miles at the lower tip. The rest was quite sleepy - farms, country estates, and pockets of unspoiled nature.
Read More
Gardens of Eden: Long Island’s Early Twentieth-Century Planned Communities
Reviewed by Tim Keogh
Read More